The deep, dark forests of northern Europe supplied people with wood, timber and food for millennia. They gave rise to myths, legends and fairy tales, and offered refuge to the persecuted. Over time, though, the forests themselves became subjugated, forced to submit to the will of humankind as forestry turned into a mighty machinery. Sweden […]

The deep, dark forests of northern Europe supplied people with wood, timber and food for millennia. They gave rise to myths, legends and fairy tales, and offered refuge to the persecuted. Over time, though, the forests themselves became subjugated, forced to submit to the will of humankind as forestry turned into a mighty machinery. Sweden is one of the world’s largest exporters of forest-based products: paper, timber, cardboard and biofuels travel across the globe, ending up in your packaging, your books, in your homes. Decisions made in Sweden about how forests are managed ripple outward far beyond the kingdom’s borders. That is why the Swedish government’s recent forestry inquiry should matter not just to those living in Sweden, but to anyone concerned about the global climate crisis. The inquiry’s central message is clear: increase forest growth, harvest more biomass, and thereby contribute to the green transition. This might sound promising. More trees mean more carbon absorbed, more wood products to replace unsustainable products. But the plan overlooks the most important part of the forest: the soil. Sweden’s oldest boreal forests are carpeted with berries and lichens, which reindeer rely on for winter forage. Photo courtesy of Staffan Widstrand. Most of the carbon in a forest is not in the trees we see, but locked into the ground, in roots, humus, fungi, microbes, and the intricate networks of life below. When forestry is intensified — through shorter rotation times, clear-cutting, heavy machines compacting the earth, and the removal of branches and…This article was originally published on Mongabay

From Conservation news via this RSS feed

  • bluemoon@piefed.socialEnglish
    1·
    2 days ago

    ignoring that it wasn’t sweden’s land until 16-1700 hundreds and that sweden isn’t a kingdom

    yes 95% of forests in sweden are harvested unsustainably as monocultural crops by deforestation methods, uprooting everything and overturning the soil meanwhile. in the north timber is harvested from “treefarms” in a cycle of 70-150 years, based on when private forest owners call in companies to “harvest trees” and in the south that’s as briefly as 50-70 years.

    yes this government is insane and greenlight uranium mines which everyone living in sweden realize will pollute heavy metals and radiation to our sweetwater - the best and purest water on this planet - while using state overreaching to dismantle local municipalities right to deny total pollution of every citizen by mining uranium (never can ‘alun skiffer’ be mined without leaking heavy metals and radiation across everywhere nearby and beyond, not in australia not in the US - both of which have outlawed it afair)

    we should absolutely have better government and better agroforestry practices. like the lübeck model of Not turning over top soil and Not deforesting for a “tree harvest”. lotsa pushback because the agroforestry institution indoctrinate & rub elbows with the agroforestry industry here (a rare occurence of longstanding corruption in the nordic continent) which is perpetuated by- and is reflected in the ‘jägmästar’ education into officially entering the agroforestry sphere.