Fear of street crime and criminals is a politically charged issue. Politicians stoke that fear to gain the consent of voters, from the anti-black Willie

Photograph Source: Gage Skidmore – CC BY-SA 2.0

Fear of street crime and criminals is a politically charged issue. Politicians stoke that fear to gain the consent of voters, from the anti-black Willie Horton commercial ads of GOP President Bush 1 against Democrat Michael Dukakis in the presidential campaign of 1988 to President Trump’s 2016 and 2024 successful runs for the White House. After decades of economic globalization and climate disruptions, the tough-on-crime platform has evolved from anti-blackness to migrant demonization. While the former remains central to U. S. politics, the latter demonizes the national origin of criminals, actual and fictional, right up to the president castigating immigration as an invasion creating social ruination at the UN recently.

How does such rhetoric match up with data on incarceration for immigrants and the native-born in the U.S.? We turn to a new study from the Cato Institute, a contributor to the DOGE, a wrecking ball on federal programs and workforce, and Project 2025, the Trump White House’s playbook for restructuring U.S. democracy.

Cato scholars Alex Nowrasteh and Krit Chanwong analyzed annual data from the American Community Survey and found that incarceration rates for immigrants are far lower than those for the native-born.

To this end the duo plotted “the incarceration risk for individuals born in 1990 by immigration status. For the 1990 cohort, native-born Americans were 267 percent more likely to be incarcerated than immigrants by age 33. Eleven percent of native-born Americans in that year-born cohort have been incarcerated compared to just three percent of immigrants. Other countries really are sending their best.”

In contrast, White House border czar Tom Homan is involved with federal immigration raids that, according to him, are “targeting the worst of the worst.” Homan allegedly took $50,000 in an FBI sting recently.

What about the incarceration risks for immigrants and native-born Americans who are Asian, Hispanic, black, and white? “Immigrants born in 1990 had a significantly lower incarceration risk than native-born Americans for all races and ethnicities born in the same year. All (legal plus illegal) Hispanic, Asian, black, and white immigrants as groups each have a lower incarceration rate than white native-born Americans. Asian illegal immigrants have the lowest incarceration risks at around 0.08 percent.”

Here’s a reason why immigrants may have lower incarceration rates. “Non-citizen criminals who are incarcerated are deported after serving their sentences,” according to

Alex Nowrasteh and Krit Chanwong, “which means they don’t respond to future American surveys because they are no longer on American soil. Put another way, our study measures whether the respondents have ever been incarcerated.”

All things equal, one thing is clear. Immigrants are not driving a crime wave in the U.S.  There is a wave of corporate crime stateside, however, with companies such as Boeing and its 737 MAX aircraft crashes a case in point.

The post Immigration, Incarceration and the Native-Born appeared first on CounterPunch.org.

From CounterPunch.org via this RSS feed