Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images
Donald Trump has made exerting federal power over the states a hallmark of his second term, attempting a takeover of Washington, D.C., and vowing to deploy the National Guard into the streets of American cities as he sees fit. But the president took another unprecedented move over the weekend as he green-lit the deployment of guardsmen from other states to Illinois and Oregon in stark defiance of their leaders and a court order.
Illinois governor J.B. Pritzker announced on Sunday that Trump had ordered 400 members of the Texas National Guard to Illinois, Oregon, and other locations in what he deemed “Trump’s Invasion.” The Democratic governor noted on social media that no government officials called him directly to discuss the deployment. “I call on Governor Abbott to immediately withdraw any support for this decision and refuse to coordinate. There is no reason a President should send military troops into a sovereign state without their knowledge, consent, or cooperation,” he wrote.
Texas governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, confirmed that he gave his full authorization to the Trump administration to call up his state’s guardsmen to “ensure safety for federal officials.” By Monday, Illinois and the city of Chicago would file a lawsuit challenging the deployment of the Texas guardsmen as well as the attempted federalization of the Illinois National Guard in the city.
But Texas was not the only state the president attempted to utilize. The Trump administration moved to send 300 members of the California National Guard to Portland, Oregon, prompting a legal challenge from California governor Gavin Newsom. “We’re suing Donald Trump. His deployment of the California National Guard to Oregon isn’t about crime. It’s about power. He is using our military as political pawns to build up his own ego. It’s appalling. It’s un-American. And it must stop,” he wrote on social media.
The president’s move to utilize troops from California and Texas appeared to be an attempt to circumvent a decision from a federal judge on Saturday that temporarily blocked Trump from deploying the National Guard in Portland, a city that he has described as “war ravaged” and “under siege” from domestic terrorists. Per the Associated Press, Trump intended to federalize 200 Oregon National Guardsmen to protect federal buildings in the city following consistent protests at the city’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility. But U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut, a Trump appointee, determined that conditions in the city did not justify such a deployment. “The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts,” she wrote in her decision, per the AP.
Trump’s attempt to involve other states over the weekend prompted an emergency hearing from Immergut late on Sunday evening. The New York Times reports that the judge declared the president’s move to utilize the California and Texas National Guards was “ in direct contravention” of her initial order. Immergut expanded her initial ruling to bar the “relocation, federalization or deployment of members of the National Guard of any state or the District of Columbia in the state of Oregon.”
The Trump administration had already filed an appeal against Immergut’s Saturday ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. But federal officials have denounced the judge’s decision in vitriolic terms, signaling a likely prolonged fight on this issue. “Today’s judicial ruling is one of the most egregious and thunderous violations of constitutional order we have ever seen — and is yet the latest example of unceasing efforts to nullify the 2024 election by fiat,” deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller posted online.
More politics
Trump’s Deployment of National Guard to Oregon and Illinois Triggers Legal ChaosAre We at War With Venezuela?Does It Matter What Your Therapist Thinks About Israel?
From Intelligencer - Daily News, Politics, Business, and Tech via this RSS feed