• School_Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Since everyone seems to struggle with understanding what fascism is, I like to keep pointing out that Mussolini, the father of fascism, thought it should be called corporatism. He defined it as the combining of corporate and state interests. That perfectly describes the republican party and a good number of democrats too.

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man I love America.

    Assuming you guys get elections in 2028. Democrats might stand a small chance of winning if the do…

    Against a guy who’s turning your country into a banana Republic.

    I haven’t voted for one of our 2 parties in 30 yrs but in that scenario even I’d take the hint and hold my nose

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d lay even odds we won’t get an election in 2026, or whoever is elected will be prevented from actually taking office.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        We will definitely continue to have elections, in the same way that places like Russia continue to have elections.

        • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Martial law could put an end to the actual vote, counting of the votes could be violently disrupted, certification most likely would be disrupted by force, and if the House still manages somehow to go to Democrats, I expect political arrests, or congress itself being dissolved.

          Too many people will go to jail if the actual laws are enforced. More to the point, all the richest people would go to jail. They can’t let that happen, and have the command of forces to stop it. Meanwhile the public is acutely aware that they are being robbed, and forcefully repressed. That doesn’t last long before violence is the only answer.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            But why would the oligarchs bother with any of that when they can just quietly subvert the vote instead, and preserve a fig leaf of democracy to dupe the public into not revolting?

            • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              You can fool some people all of the time, or all the people some of the time, never all of the people all of the time. The public has reached the end of that time.

              The side affect of the conspiracy driven movement that the right has created, is that public disbelief is at an all time high. Refusal to verify, is proof of a lie at this point. They can’t verify a vote they manipulate. They’ve been losing every special election by land slide numbers, and then will expect the public to believe they won an election they’re redistricting to save themselves from? That would be a quick recipe for torches and pitch forks.

              Their plans, planned for violence. From the start, they knew they were going to provoke it. The only question now really, is when the fight starts.

              • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                It makes me so sad that I think you are overestimating how much the average American cares if the election is stolen. Put another way: Tons of people, millions and millions, think that Biden stole the election, and no one started a civil war about it. The actual action was limited to the fringes of the fringes, and it didn’t work.

                Also consider this: BLM was one of the biggest protest movements in history, with about 20 million people participating in some way. But, it was only 20 million. Compared to the kinds of uprisings they had in Eastern Europe that actually overthrew the corrupt dictatorships, it was small.

                Also, by coincidence, 20 million is almost exactly how many people went to the Gulag (out of a much smaller population.) You might say, “Well there’s no way they could steal the election and then send anyone who complained to one of these detention centers they’re desperately building right now at tremendous scale. There would be an outcry. People would care enough to stop it.” Well, maybe. On the other hand, they’re Gulag-ing thousands of immigrants currently and have now moved on to a few dozen citizens, and who is stopping them?

                • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  It’s not a matter of the election being stolen, it’s a matter of if there is any accountability for the abuses of the country. Everyone is about to be poorer, and the people responsible will be putting troops in the streets. They’re taking food away from hungry people, taking medicine away from the sick, and making everyone poorer. That never ends with calm debate. The only question is when the violence starts.